This 'blogsite' was launched in January 2014 as a development of SRHE News, to provide members and others associated with the Society to read and comment on the most pressing issues with Higher Education research.
The site is available from the following link SRHE blog.
This is the newsletter of SRHE. The SRHE Newsletter includes contributions from members across the globe, details of upcoming events and reports on recent activities.
Click on 'Apply now' below for details and the many other benefits of membership
The current and previous issues of SRHE News are available to SRHE members only via the following link Members Area.
For further enquiries, or to submit any articles of interest, please contact the editor at firstname.lastname@example.org
Out Now - SRHE News Issue 28 - April 2017
Extract from editorial
What's wrong with management in higher education?
Matthew Reisz reported for Times Higher Education on 30 March 2017 that 'the results beginning to come in from the National Senior Management Survey are both startling and dismaying.' He said: 'Early data from the National Senior Management Survey, which is being developed by academics at eight universities, find that barely one in 10 (10.4 per cent) respondents is satisfied with the way their institution is managed; 76.5 per cent are not.'
This is fake news: take a look at the National Senior Management Survey. It has grand aims but asks a series of leading questions, and its self-selecting sample is likely to be all those who want to complain about senior management in their institution. There is something wrong with the methods of this survey, but that doesn't mean there is nothing wrong with senior management in HE. Indeed, the progenitors of the National Senior Management Survey seem to have been motivated by despair at the apparently irresistible rise of managerialism and the equally irresistible rise of senior managers' salaries, even while university staff salaries are held down. So what's wrong with senior management?